Search Sustopedia

Reporting, Finance & Governance

Impact materiality

Impact materiality is the assessment perspective used to determine whether a sustainability matter is material because of an undertaking's actual or potential, positive or negative impacts on people or the environment. Under ESRS, it considers impacts connected with operations and the value chain across short-, medium-, and long-term horizons.

Type
Concept
Updated
Status
Impact materiality is part of the double-materiality approach in the European Sustainability Reporting Standards adopted through delegated regulation.

In simple terms

The assessment starts with impacts, not only with effects on the reporting company. Financial materiality is assessed through a different lens focused on risks and opportunities for the undertaking. Impact materiality considers impacts the undertaking causes, contributes to, or is directly linked to through business relationships. For negative impacts, severity is central and likelihood is also considered for potential impacts; human-rights impacts receive particular attention. Positive impacts are assessed by scale and scope, with likelihood considered when potential. The process should use relevant evidence and engagement with affected stakeholders or credible representatives, then document how material matters and disclosure requirements were determined.

Why it matters

Impact materiality ensures sustainability reporting addresses significant effects on people and the environment even when near-term financial consequences are unclear. Double materiality requires this perspective to be considered alongside the financial perspective. It can guide due diligence, strategy, targets, and resource allocation. Transparent criteria and evidence are essential because a narrowly framed assessment can omit value-chain harms, vulnerable groups, or long-term ecological effects.

Example

A garment company maps impacts across its own sites and suppliers. It identifies severe potential worker-safety harms in outsourced production and major water impacts in fibre processing. Even before either issue produces a measurable financial loss, the company assesses them for impact materiality using severity, likelihood, stakeholder evidence, and value-chain information.

How it differs

Double materiality

Impact materiality examines the undertaking's material impacts on people and the environment; double materiality combines this perspective with financial materiality, and a matter may qualify under either or both.

Continue learning

Next reading

  1. Market-based methodClimate & energy
  2. Impact measurementReporting & governance
  3. Mitigation financeReporting & governance

A–Z navigation

Browse nearby terms

These alphabetical neighbours support browsing; they are not semantic relationships.

  1. Impact investingReporting & governance
  2. Inclusive wealthNature & water

References

  1. EFRAG IG 1: Materiality Assessment Implementation GuidanceEuropean Financial Reporting Advisory Group
  2. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 as regards sustainability reporting standardsEuropean Union

Current status

As of
Issuer
European Commission
Jurisdiction
European Union
Instrument or version
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 and ESRS
Status
Impact materiality is part of the double-materiality approach in the European Sustainability Reporting Standards adopted through delegated regulation.

Applicability: EFRAG IG 1 provides non-authoritative implementation guidance. Reporting entities should use the ESRS text and amendments applicable to their reporting period and confirm whether the underlying reporting requirements apply to them.