Search Sustopedia

MetricCommunities and human rights

Actual community investment expenditure

Measurement answer

What this metric measures

Actual reporting-period expenditure for qualifying community investment directed to external beneficiaries, with currency, scale, accounting basis, purpose and scope retained.

Specification

Metric specification

Result format
Structured table
Unit
Actual expenditure in the stated currency and scale, for example million euros
Reporting basis
Reporting period
Aggregation
Add only non-overlapping records after applying the stated identity and deduplication controls
Pillar
Social
Topic
Communities and human rights
Controlled domain
Human rights
Entity type
Metric

Reporting boundary

Include actual expenditure for qualifying external beneficiaries during one period. Add only disjoint rows with the same currency, scale, accounting basis and beneficiary boundary.

Verified source occurrences

Framework coverage

This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.

  • Adopting Disclosure

    GRI Standards

    Source evidence
    Publisher
    Global Reporting Initiative
    Edition
    2016
    Requirement
    Not Specified
    Relationship
    Defines Disclosure
    Mapping outcome
    Direct Evidence
    Source locator
    Disclosure 201-1 and community-investment guidance, PDF pages 8-10
    Open official framework source

Value structure

Dimensions and units

Unit
Actual expenditure in the stated currency and scale, for example million euros
Reporting basis
Reporting period

Unit meaning: A non-negative monetary amount with an ISO 4217 currency code, stated scale and accounting basis; a bare currency symbol is insufficient.

Table fields and units

  • Expenditure type
  • External beneficiary
  • Geography
  • Amount
  • Currency and scale
  • Accounting basis
  • Reporting period

Published dimensions

  • ISO currency and scale
  • cash or accrual basis
  • external beneficiary and recipient class
  • purpose and expenditure type
  • geography
  • cash or non-cash valuation basis
  • entity boundary and reporting period

Disclosure method

Formula information

Status
Not applicable
Formula type
Structured Disclosure

Disclosure form

No single formula

Populate the structured fields from qualifying source observations and retain each field-level unit, boundary, status, and method; do not collapse the disclosure into one calculated value.

Verified sources

Evidence and status sources

Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.

Measurement evidence

  • Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026

    GRI 201: Economic Performance 2016

    Publisher
    Global Reporting Initiative
    Edition
    2016
    Locator
    Disclosure 201-1 and community-investment guidance, PDF pages 8-10

    Supports: Supports the actual community-investment monetary-flow profile and its expenditure boundary.

    Open official source

Use with context

Interpretation boundaries

Method disclosures required

Source-edition basis: GRI 201: Economic Performance 2016, current effective edition at the research cutoff.

  • State ISO currency, scale and accounting basis.
  • Identify external beneficiary scope and expenditure purpose.
  • Keep commitments and core-business infrastructure outside the admitted amount.

Record-specific limitations

  • Expenditure does not measure additionality, beneficiary reach, impact, avoided harm or remedy.
  • Commitments, budgets and future pledges are not actual expenditure and cannot be added.

Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.

Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.