Critical concerns communicated to the highest governance body
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Number and nature of distinct critical concerns communicated to the named highest governance body during the reporting period, preserving concern identity, communication mechanism, deduplication, privacy and the separation of communication from later case states.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- Critical concerns communicated (distinct concerns)
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
- Aggregation
- Add only disjoint concern identities under the same definition, body, period and boundary; overlapping topic categories are not summed without a deduplication rule.
- Pillar
- Governance
- Topic
- Governance concerns and escalation
- Controlled domain
- Governance and business conduct
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Communication attempts, recipients, meetings, messages, allegations, people and later case states are separate units. Multiple messages about one concern do not automatically create several concerns, and prior-period concerns need an explicit repeat-event rule.
Cross-library identity
Library mappings and variants
These links compare quantity, population, boundary, period, unit, denominator, aggregation, dimensions, and method edition. Partial relationships are navigation aids only and never authorize observation reuse.
- Aggregate relationshipPartial relationship; observations remain separate.How critical concerns are communicated to highest governance body profile — GRI 2-16, paragraph a
- Aggregate relationshipPartial relationship; observations remain separate.Nature of critical concerns communicated to highest governance body during reporting period — GRI 2-16, paragraph b
- Aggregate relationshipPartial relationship; observations remain separate.Total critical concerns communicated to highest governance body during reporting period count — GRI 2-16,…
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureGRI 2-16
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Files published 19 June 2025; entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Component Of
- Mapping outcome
- Cross Library Link
- Source locator
- GRI 2-16, paragraph a; taxonomy entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Adopting DisclosureGRI 2-16
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Files published 19 June 2025; entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Component Of
- Mapping outcome
- Cross Library Link
- Source locator
- GRI 2-16, paragraph b; taxonomy entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Adopting DisclosureGRI 2-16
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Files published 19 June 2025; entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Component Of
- Mapping outcome
- Cross Library Link
- Source locator
- GRI 2-16, paragraph b; taxonomy entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2021 edition, effective for reports published from 1 January 2023
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Disclosure 2-9 PDF p20; Disclosure 2-16 p27; Disclosure 2-19 p30
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Critical concerns communicated (distinct concerns)
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
Unit meaning: One unit is one deduplicated concern satisfying the declared definition and communicated to the named highest governance body during the reporting period.
Table fields and units
- reporting entity and boundary
- named highest governance body
- period start and end
- critical-concern definition
- concern identity and deduplication rule
- Reported value
- Critical concerns communicated (distinct concerns)
- Measurement-source edition
- Assurance status
Published dimensions
- Reporting entity and boundary.
- Named highest governance body.
- Period start and end.
- Critical-concern definition.
- Concern identity and deduplication rule.
- Communication event and mechanism.
- Date first communicated.
- Nature or topic category.
- Negative-impact or business-conduct relationship.
- Repeat, reopened and multi-topic treatment.
- Privacy, privilege, confidentiality and suppression state.
- Source edition and assurance state.
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaPopulate the structured fields from qualifying source observations and retain each field-level unit, boundary, status, and method; do not collapse the disclosure into one calculated value.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2021 edition, effective for reports published from 1 January 2023
- Locator
- Disclosure 2-9 PDF p20; Disclosure 2-16 p27; Disclosure 2-19 p30
Supports: Supports the measurement definition, boundary, and source-reported fields for Critical concerns communicated to the highest governance body.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021 — 2021 edition, effective for reports published from 1 January 2023. Retain the exact source edition on every observation; later editions require a separate method profile.
- Reporting entity and boundary.
- Named highest governance body.
- Period start and end.
- Critical-concern definition.
- Concern identity and deduplication rule.
- Communication event and mechanism.
- Date first communicated.
- Nature or topic category.
- Retain the exact measurement-source edition with every observation.
- One unit is one deduplicated concern satisfying the declared definition and communicated to the named highest governance body during the reporting period.
Record-specific limitations
- The count depends on reporting channels, escalation thresholds, organizational culture and legal privilege.
- It does not measure harm prevalence, allegation merit, investigation, substantiation, resolution, remedy or governance effectiveness.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.