Employees receiving anti-corruption training
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Number and percentage of the declared employee population reported as having received anti-corruption training under a stated receipt rule and lookback.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- Structured table — field-level units: Employees trained — count and percent of eligible employees
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
- Aggregation
- Combine only compatible component counts and recompute the percentage; never average percentages
- Pillar
- Governance
- Topic
- Business conduct and compliance
- Controlled domain
- Governance and business conduct
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Use one employee definition, training-receipt rule, lookback, region and reporting period. Combine only disjoint compatible counts and never average percentages.
Cross-library identity
Library mappings and variants
These links compare quantity, population, boundary, period, unit, denominator, aggregation, dimensions, and method edition. Partial relationships are navigation aids only and never authorize observation reuse.
- Different calculation methodPartial relationship; observations remain separate.Employees receiving anticorruption and antibribery training during period count — G1-3
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureESRS G1
European Sustainability Reporting Standards
- Publisher
- EFRAG
- Edition
- Taxonomy entry point dated 22 December 2023; package published 30 August 2024
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Method Variant
- Mapping outcome
- Cross Library Link
- Source locator
- ESRS G1; G1-3; paragraph AR 8; taxonomy concept esrs_NumberOfEmployeesReceivingAnticorruptionAndAntibriberyTrainingDuringPeriod
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Disclosure 205-2 and guidance, PDF page 9
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Structured table — field-level units: Employees trained — count and percent of eligible employees
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
Unit meaning: Each table field uses its stated unit. The table shows a non-negative trained-employee count, positive eligible-employee count and a 0-to-100 percent result for the same population and lookback.
Table fields and units
- Region
- Employee category
- Receipt rule and lookback
- Employees trained
- Eligible employees
- Percent trained
Published dimensions
- employee population
- region
- employee category
- training receipt rule
- lookback
- trained count
- eligible count
- reporting period
- entity boundary
Calculation method
Formula information
- Status
- Specified
- Formula type
- Percentage
Formula
trained_employee_percentage = (trained_employee_count ÷ eligible_employee_count) × 100Apply this formula only with the metric's declared population, reporting period, units, denominator, and method-edition controls.
Variables
| Symbol | Variable | Definition | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
trained_employee_count | trained employee count | Input defined by the reporting boundary for Employees receiving anti-corruption training. | count |
eligible_employee_count | eligible employee count | Input defined by the reporting boundary for Employees receiving anti-corruption training. | count |
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
GRI 205: Anti-corruption 2016
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016
- Locator
- Disclosure 205-2 and guidance, PDF page 9
Supports: Supports employee anti-corruption training count and percentage coverage by region and category.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: GRI 205: Anti-corruption 2016, current effective edition at the research cutoff.
- Define employee eligibility, receipt rule and training lookback.
- Use compatible numerator and denominator counts for the same boundary and period.
- State regional and employee-category breakdowns without double counting.
Record-specific limitations
- Received training does not necessarily mean completed training during the period.
- Coverage does not measure knowledge, behavior, control effectiveness or absence of corruption.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.