Employees returning to work after parental leave
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Employees who returned to work after parental leave ended in the reporting period, shown with the employees due to return and any source-reported return-to-work percentage for the same cohort.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- Employees returned (headcount and return-to-work percentage)
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period or measurement date declared by the source method
- Aggregation
- Do not sum or arithmetically average reported percentages, rates, ratios, or averages; consolidate only from compatible component observations under a disclosed method.
- Pillar
- Social
- Topic
- Leave, complaints and workforce rights
- Controlled domain
- Workforce
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Employees only. Counts can be summed across mutually exclusive cohorts under the same return rule after employee deduplication. Rates are not summed or averaged. Return is not retention and cannot be inferred from leave take-up.
Cross-library identity
Library mappings and variants
These links compare quantity, population, boundary, period, unit, denominator, aggregation, dimensions, and method edition. Partial relationships are navigation aids only and never authorize observation reuse.
- Aggregate relationshipPartial relationship; observations remain separate.Total employees that returned to work in reporting period after parental leave ended count — GRI 401-3, paragraph c
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureGRI 401-3
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Files published 19 June 2025; entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Component Of
- Mapping outcome
- Cross Library Link
- Source locator
- GRI 401-3, paragraph c; taxonomy entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016 edition
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- effective date and rights PDF pp1-2; Disclosure 401-3 and rate guidance p10; parental-leave glossary p12
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Employees returned (headcount and return-to-work percentage)
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period or measurement date declared by the source method
Unit meaning: The count covers employees who returned after leave ended; any percentage uses the compatible employees-due-to-return cohort as its denominator.
Table fields and units
- GRI 401 edition
- Employee population
- Parental-leave definition and paid or unpaid status where reported
- Source-reported gender category
- Jurisdiction or location
- Reported value
- Employees returned (headcount and return-to-work percentage)
- Measurement-source edition
- Assurance status
Published dimensions
- GRI 401 edition.
- Employee population.
- Parental-leave definition and paid or unpaid status where reported.
- Source-reported gender category.
- Jurisdiction or location.
- Leave-end date or cohort.
- Due-return rule.
- Actual return date.
- Partial or intermittent return rule.
- Numerator and denominator counts or undisclosed status.
- Reporting period.
- Privacy status.
- Source and assurance status.
Calculation method
Formula information
- Status
- Specified
- Formula type
- Percentage
Formula
P = (N ÷ D) × 100Use the source-defined numerator and denominator for the same population, period, boundary, and method; do not infer an unstated denominator.
Variables
| Symbol | Variable | Definition | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
N | qualifying numerator | Qualifying observations within the qualifying population and boundary defined for Employees returning to work after parental leave. | Dimensionless |
D | declared denominator | Complete compatible denominator for the qualifying population and boundary defined for Employees returning to work after parental leave. | Dimensionless |
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
GRI 401: Employment 2016
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016 edition
- Locator
- effective date and rights PDF pp1-2; Disclosure 401-3 and rate guidance p10; parental-leave glossary p12
Supports: Supports the measurement definition, boundary, and source-reported fields for Employees returning to work after parental leave.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: GRI 401: Employment 2016 — 2016 edition. Retain the exact source edition on every observation; later editions require a separate method profile.
- GRI 401 edition.
- Employee population.
- Parental-leave definition and paid or unpaid status where reported.
- Source-reported gender category.
- Jurisdiction or location.
- Leave-end date or cohort.
- Due-return rule.
- Actual return date.
- Retain the exact measurement-source edition with every observation.
- The count covers employees who returned after leave ended; any percentage uses the compatible employees-due-to-return cohort as its denominator.
Record-specific limitations
- Scheduled returns, leave extensions, resignations during leave and phased returns can change the denominator.
- A return says nothing about job quality or later retention.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.