Fines paid for significant legal non-compliance
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Number and monetary value of fines paid during the reporting period for significant non-compliance, retaining whether the underlying matter occurred in the current or a previous period.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- Structured table — field-level units: Fines paid — count and stated currency amount
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
- Aggregation
- Non-additive; retain the complete declared profile and do not force a scalar total
- Pillar
- Governance
- Topic
- Business conduct and compliance
- Controlled domain
- Governance and business conduct
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Include fines actually paid during one period. Keep current- and prior-period underlying matters distinct and aggregate only disjoint fines in one currency and scale.
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2021
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Disclosure 2-27(b) and guidance, PDF page 44
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Structured table — field-level units: Fines paid — count and stated currency amount
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
Unit meaning: Each table field uses its stated unit. Fine count and amount paid are separate outputs. Monetary rows require ISO currency, scale, payment date and sign; paid is not incurred, imposed or provisioned.
Table fields and units
- Fine identity
- Matter family
- Jurisdiction
- Payment date
- Occurrence period
- Amount paid
- Currency and scale
- Appeal state
Published dimensions
- fine identity
- matter-family identity
- jurisdiction
- law or regulation
- payment date
- underlying occurrence period
- currency and scale
- appeal state
- entity boundary
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaPopulate the structured fields from qualifying source observations and retain each field-level unit, boundary, status, and method; do not collapse the disclosure into one calculated value.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2021
- Locator
- Disclosure 2-27(b) and guidance, PDF page 44
Supports: Supports the count and monetary value of fines paid for significant legal non-compliance and the occurrence-period distinction.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021, current effective edition at the research cutoff.
- Define fine identity and confirm payment during the period.
- State whether the underlying non-compliance occurred in the current or an earlier period.
- State ISO currency, scale, sign, jurisdiction and overlap controls.
Record-specific limitations
- Paid is not incurred, imposed, recognized, appealed, reserved or provisioned.
- Fine count is not significant-instance count, and one matter can involve several fines.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.