Formally registered Indigenous Peoples' rights cases
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Distinct legal actions or formal complaints concerning Indigenous Peoples' rights registered through a formal process during the reporting period.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- Distinct formally registered rights cases
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
- Aggregation
- Add only non-overlapping records after applying the stated identity and deduplication controls
- Pillar
- Social
- Topic
- Communities and human rights
- Controlled domain
- Human rights
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Count formal registrations during one reporting period. Deduplicate the same matter registered in multiple venues and do not merge it with a finding unless overlap is resolved.
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Disclosure 411-1 and incident guidance, PDF page 8
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Distinct formally registered rights cases
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
Unit meaning: A non-negative count of legal actions or formal complaints registered under the declared case-family and venue-deduplication rule.
Table fields and units
- Case family
- Registration type
- Registering body
- Jurisdiction
- Registration date
- Rights domain
- Case state
Published dimensions
- legal action or formal complaint
- registering organization or authority
- jurisdiction
- case-family key
- registration date
- rights domain
- explicit case state
- privacy and assurance state
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaPopulate the structured fields from qualifying source observations and retain each field-level unit, boundary, status, and method; do not collapse the disclosure into one calculated value.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
GRI 411: Rights of Indigenous Peoples 2016
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016
- Locator
- Disclosure 411-1 and incident guidance, PDF page 8
Supports: Supports the formal legal-action or complaint population concerning Indigenous Peoples' rights.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: GRI 411: Rights of Indigenous Peoples 2016, current effective edition at the research cutoff.
- State the formal registration basis and venue.
- Use a case-family key to control duplicate registrations.
- Report substantiation, remediation and closure only when explicitly evidenced.
Record-specific limitations
- Registration shows that a formal case exists; it does not prove the allegation, severity, liability, remedy or closure.
- Indigenous identity must not be inferred, and small or sensitive groups require privacy protection.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.