Functions at risk covered by anti-corruption training programs
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Source-reported percentage of declared functions at corruption or bribery risk covered by training programs, preserving the risk-identification and coverage rules.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- Percent of functions at risk covered by training programs
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
- Aggregation
- Non-additive; retain the complete declared profile and do not force a scalar total
- Pillar
- Governance
- Topic
- Business conduct and compliance
- Controlled domain
- Governance and business conduct
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Use the source's declared function population, corruption-risk identification rule, program-coverage rule, legal scope and period. Do not infer person counts.
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
European Sustainability Reporting Standards
- Publisher
- European Union
- Edition
- Consolidated 1 January 2025
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- ESRS G1-3 paragraph 21, PDF page 298
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Percent of functions at risk covered by training programs
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
Unit meaning: A source-reported value from 0 to 100 for the declared at-risk function population; it is not the percentage of people trained.
Table fields and units
- Function
- Risk-identification rule
- Training program
- Coverage state
- Reported percent
- Reporting period
Published dimensions
- function population
- risk-identification method
- risk state
- training-program definition
- coverage rule
- legal scope
- entity boundary
- reporting period
Calculation method
Formula information
- Status
- Specified
- Formula type
- Percentage
Formula
P = (N ÷ D) × 100Use the source-defined numerator and denominator for the same population, period, boundary, and method; do not infer an unstated denominator.
Variables
| Symbol | Variable | Definition | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
N | qualifying numerator | Qualifying observations within the qualifying population and boundary defined for Functions at risk covered by anti-corruption training programs. | Dimensionless |
D | declared denominator | Complete compatible denominator for the qualifying population and boundary defined for Functions at risk covered by anti-corruption training programs. | Dimensionless |
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, consolidated display
- Publisher
- European Union
- Edition
- Consolidated 1 January 2025
- Locator
- ESRS G1-3 paragraph 21, PDF page 298
Supports: Supports source-reported coverage of functions at risk by anti-corruption or anti-bribery training programs.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 consolidated 1 January 2025, ESRS G1-3.
- Define the function population and corruption-risk identification rule.
- Define program coverage and state the source-reported percentage.
- State legal scope, entity boundary and reporting period.
Record-specific limitations
- Function coverage does not establish how many people trained, completion, competence, effectiveness or absence of risk.
- Percentages are non-additive and cannot be averaged across different function definitions.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.