Search Sustopedia

MetricClimate change

Green hydrogen project leak detection and prevention coverage

Measurement answer

What this metric measures

Reports the number and proportion of hydrogen projects equipped with continuous leak-detection systems, together with the technologies used and the procedures for testing, monitoring, maintenance, and functional verification.

Specification

Metric specification

Result format
Structured table
Unit
hydrogen projects; % of hydrogen projects — source-defined reporting unit
Reporting basis
Reporting period covered by the disclosure
Aggregation
Report the number of equipped hydrogen projects and the proportion of reported hydrogen projects that are equipped.
Pillar
Environmental
Topic
Climate change
Controlled domain
Climate and greenhouse gases
Entity type
Metric

Reporting boundary

Hydrogen projects within the organization’s reported project population.

Verified source occurrences

Framework coverage

This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.

  • Adopting Disclosure

    TNFD sector guidance

    Source evidence
    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents)
    Requirement
    Not Specified
    Relationship
    Defines Disclosure
    Mapping outcome
    Direct Evidence
    Source locator
    Page 121, Additional sector metrics table, AF.A23.3
    Open official framework source
  • Adopting Disclosure

    TNFD sector guidance

    AF.A23.3
    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Version 1.0, June 2026
    Requirement
    Recommended
    Relationship
    Maps Source Identity
    Mapping outcome
    Published
    Source locator
    Page 121, Additional sector metrics table, AF.A23.3
    Open official framework source

Value structure

Dimensions and units

Unit
hydrogen projects; % of hydrogen projects — source-defined reporting unit
Reporting basis
Reporting period covered by the disclosure

Unit meaning: Values use hydrogen projects; % of hydrogen projects under the disclosed TNFD sector-guidance method, reporting period and boundary.

Table fields and units

  • Leak-detection coverage status
  • Number of hydrogen projects
  • Proportion of hydrogen projects (%)
  • Leak-detection technology
  • Testing procedure
  • Monitoring procedure
  • Maintenance procedure
  • Functional-verification procedure

Published dimensions

  • Leak-detection coverage status
  • Leak-detection technology used, including sensors, infrared detection, pressure monitoring, or artificial intelligence
  • System testing procedures
  • Monitoring procedures
  • Maintenance procedures
  • Functional-verification procedures

Calculation method

Formula information

Status
Specified
Formula type
Percentage

Formula

Coverage (%) = (number of reported hydrogen projects equipped with continuous leak detection systems / total reported hydrogen projects) × 100

Apply the source-defined TNFD sector-guidance method within the stated reporting boundary. This is a standalone additional-sector structured reporting metric with explicit numerator outcome, denominator form, technology dimensions, and required procedural disclosures. It is not an emission factor, eligibility test, or calculation operand. No shortlisted metric has the same hydrogen-project population, continuous leak-detection construct, dimensions, and required method disclosures.

Variables

SymbolVariableDefinitionUnit
N_equippedEquipped hydrogen projectsNumber of reported hydrogen projects equipped with continuous leak detection systems.hydrogen projects
N_totalReported hydrogen projectsTotal number of hydrogen projects in the reported project population.hydrogen projects
CoverageLeak detection and prevention coverageProportion of reported hydrogen projects equipped with continuous leak detection systems.%

Verified sources

Evidence and status sources

Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.

Measurement evidence

  • Measurement evidenceChecked 30 August 2026

    TNFD additional sector guidance collection

    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents)
    Locator
    Page 121, Additional sector metrics table, AF.A23.3

    Supports: The official TNFD sector guidance supports the identity, boundary and method basis of “Green hydrogen project leak detection and prevention coverage”.

    Open official source

Use with context

Interpretation boundaries

Method disclosures required

Source-edition basis: TNFD sector guidance, Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents).

  • Disclose the technology or technologies used for continuous leak detection.
  • Disclose procedures for testing, monitoring, maintenance, or functional verification of leak-detection systems.
  • Disclose the reported hydrogen-project population used as the denominator for the proportion.

Record-specific limitations

  • The metric measures the presence of continuous leak-detection systems and associated procedures; it does not measure hydrogen leakage quantities, leak rates, avoided emissions, or system effectiveness.
  • The denominator must be disclosed because the source requires a proportion of hydrogen projects but does not define project eligibility or organizational consolidation rules.

Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.

Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.