Habitat area by protection and restoration status
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Area of a named habitat retained separately by protected, under-restoration, restored, rehabilitated, or recreated status and by site and control relationship.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- Structured table — see field-level units
- Reporting basis
- Reporting-date area stock with action and validation dates
- Aggregation
- Sum only unique polygons within one mutually exclusive status view
- Pillar
- Environmental
- Topic
- Biodiversity, ecosystems and land
- Controlled domain
- Nature, biodiversity and land
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Named habitat polygons classified by protection, under-restoration, restored, rehabilitated, or recreated status, site, control relationship, action stage, and observation date. Restoration and offsets remain distinct.
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting Disclosurehabitat-area-by-protection-and-restoration-status
CDP Full Corporate Questionnaire 2026
- Publisher
- CDP
- Edition
- Full Corporate Questionnaire and Reporting Guidance 2026 v1.3, revised 6 August 2026
- Requirement
- Conditional
- Relationship
- Reuses Canonical Metric
- Mapping outcome
- Reused
- Source locator
- Q11.13.1, numeric field 1 | Q11.13.1, numeric field 2 | Q11.17.1, numeric field 1 | Q11.17.1, numeric field 2
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Published 2024; effective for reporting from 1 January 2026
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Effective-date notice and Disclosures 101-2, 101-5, 101-6, and 101-7, PDF pages 1–2 and 9–30
- Adopting DisclosureC1.1
TNFD sector guidance
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Version 1.0, June 2024
- Requirement
- Conditional
- Relationship
- Reuses Canonical Metric
- Mapping outcome
- Reused
- Source locator
- Page 46, Section 3.1, Table 13, C1.1 (ecosystem conserved or restored)
- Adopting DisclosureC1.1
TNFD sector guidance
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Version 1.0, June 2024
- Requirement
- Conditional
- Relationship
- Reuses Canonical Metric
- Mapping outcome
- Reused
- Source locator
- Page 59, Section 3.1, Table 12, C1.1
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Structured table — see field-level units
- Reporting basis
- Reporting-date area stock with action and validation dates
Unit meaning: This metric is reported as a structured table; each field carries the unit stated in the table fields below.
Table fields and units
- Site, habitat or ecosystem type, polygon, control relationship, and boundary
- Status (protected, under restoration, restored, rehabilitated, or recreated)
- Area (ha — hectares of the named habitat polygon; 1 ha = 10,000 m²)
- Action stage, start, completion, validation and observation dates
- Target species, review status, stakeholder engagement, consent state, method, and source
Published dimensions
- Site, habitat, polygon, protection or restoration status, control, stage, and observation date
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaPopulate the structured fields from qualifying source observations and retain each field-level unit, boundary, status, and method; do not collapse the disclosure into one calculated value.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
GRI 101: Biodiversity 2024
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Published 2024; effective for reporting from 1 January 2026
- Locator
- Effective-date notice and Disclosures 101-2, 101-5, 101-6, and 101-7, PDF pages 1–2 and 9–30
Supports: Official publisher reference linked specifically to the Sustopedia metric “Habitat area by protection and restoration status”; interpret it with the source-edition basis and limitations shown on this page.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: Effective GRI 101: Biodiversity 2024 restoration profile and binding ESRS E4 application guidance under Regulation (EU) 2023/2772.
- Name site, habitat or ecosystem type, polygon, status, control relationship, and on-site or off-site boundary.
- State area in hectares of the named habitat, where 1 hectare equals 10,000 square metres.
- State action stage, start, completion and validation dates, target species, and review status.
- State stakeholder engagement and consent status, observation date, method, and source.
- Identify overlapping statuses and sum only unique polygons in a declared mutually exclusive view.
Record-specific limitations
- Protected or treated area does not establish habitat recovery, ecological condition, or additionality.
- Protection and restoration statuses may overlap and cannot be added without a mutually exclusive polygon view.
- Ownership, control, action stage, review, and stakeholder-consent state affect interpretation.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.