Hazardous waste recycled at end of life
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Percentage of total production input-material weight represented by hazardous waste recycled for reuse from end-of-life or final-disposal handling.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Single value
- Unit
- % — source-defined reporting unit
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period used by the reporting organization; no further period specification is present in the extracted evidence.
- Aggregation
- Total weight of hazardous waste recycled from end of life or final disposal for reuse divided by total weight of input materials used in production, expressed as a percentage.
- Pillar
- Environmental
- Topic
- Waste
- Controlled domain
- Materials, circularity and waste
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Hazardous waste from end-of-life or final-disposal handling for reuse, with applicability stated for direct operations, downstream and end-of-life stages.
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
TNFD sector guidance
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents)
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Page 55, Section 3.2, Table 14: Core sector disclosure indicators and metrics | Page 54, Section 3.2, Table 14, Metric no. C.C2.0
- Adopting DisclosureBP.C2.0
TNFD sector guidance
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Version 1.0, June 2024
- Requirement
- Conditional
- Relationship
- Maps Source Identity
- Mapping outcome
- Published
- Source locator
- Page 55, Section 3.2, Table 14: Core sector disclosure indicators and metrics
- Adopting DisclosureC.C2.0
TNFD sector guidance
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Version 1.0, June 2024
- Requirement
- Conditional
- Relationship
- Maps Source Identity
- Mapping outcome
- Published
- Source locator
- Page 54, Section 3.2, Table 14, Metric no. C.C2.0
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- % — source-defined reporting unit
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period used by the reporting organization; no further period specification is present in the extracted evidence.
Unit meaning: Values use % under the disclosed TNFD sector-guidance method, reporting period and boundary.
Published dimensions
- life-cycle stage: direct operations, downstream, end of life
- waste classification: hazardous waste
- material input composition: new and recycled input materials
- official metric code: C.C2.0
Calculation method
Formula information
- Status
- Specified
- Formula type
- Percentage
Formula
(R_eol / I_total) × 100Apply the source-defined TNFD sector-guidance method within the stated reporting boundary. This is a standalone percentage outcome with an explicit numerator, denominator and stated life-cycle applicability. It is not equivalent to hazardous-waste generated, hazardous-waste mass, or finance-normalized hazardous-waste ratios in the shortlist. The materially compatible end-of-life candidate is consolidated under the same stable identity while retaining its source route.
Variables
| Symbol | Variable | Definition | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
R_eol | Hazardous waste recycled at end of life | Total weight of hazardous waste recycled from end-of-life or final-disposal handling for reuse. | mass |
I_total | Total input materials used in production | Total weight of input materials used in production, including new and recycled materials where applicable. | mass |
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 30 August 2026
TNFD additional sector guidance collection
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents)
- Locator
- Page 55, Section 3.2, Table 14: Core sector disclosure indicators and metrics | Page 54, Section 3.2, Table 14, Metric no. C.C2.0
Supports: The official TNFD sector guidance supports the identity, boundary and method basis of “Hazardous waste recycled at end of life”.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: TNFD sector guidance, Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents).
- Hazardous-waste classification and any applicable legal or reporting definition.
- Weight basis and measurement or estimation method for recycled hazardous waste.
- Definition of end-of-life or final-disposal material included in the numerator.
- Whether and how material is determined to be recycled for reuse.
- Total input-material weight included in the denominator, including treatment of new and recycled materials.
- Organizational and value-chain-stage coverage.
Record-specific limitations
- The denominator is total production input-material weight rather than total hazardous-waste weight.
- The extracted evidence does not specify hazardous-waste classification criteria, consolidation approach, geography, product population, or measurement method.
- The source locator does not provide an official metric code in the extracted candidate.
- The candidate cites alignment with GRI 306 and SASB RT-CH-150a.1; those cited frameworks are context and do not replace the TNFD-defined construct.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.