Search Sustopedia

MetricValue-chain human rights and due diligence

Identified smelters and refiners by due-diligence evidence status

Measurement answer

What this metric measures

Smelters and refiners identified within a declared mineral or metal supply-chain boundary, recorded with dated traceability, audit, scheme-recognition, conformity and origin-evidence states without treating any one state as a universal conflict-free certification.

Specification

Metric specification

Result format
Structured table
Unit
Identified smelter/refiner records
Reporting basis
Reporting period or measurement date declared by the source method
Aggregation
Do not sum or arithmetically average reported percentages, rates, ratios, or averages; consolidate only from compatible component observations under a disclosed method.
Pillar
Social
Topic
Value-chain human rights and due diligence
Controlled domain
Human rights
Entity type
Metric

Reporting boundary

One entity can process multiple commodities and have multiple evidence states, so commodity and status rows are parallel views. Entity counts can be added only across mutually exclusive, deduplicated records under the same covered universe and as-of date. Audit, scheme, list and origin statuses are not added together. Recycled/scrap conclusions remain separate from primary-material sourcing.

Verified source occurrences

Framework coverage

This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.

  • Adopting Disclosure

    EU laws and regulatory guidance

    Source evidence
    Publisher
    European Union
    Edition
    2017 edition
    Requirement
    Not Specified
    Relationship
    Defines Disclosure
    Mapping outcome
    Direct Evidence
    Source locator
    Article 4 traceability PDF p8, Article 5 p9, Articles 6-7 p10, Articles 8-9 pp11-12 and Article 17 pp14-15.
    Open official framework source

Value structure

Dimensions and units

Unit
Identified smelter/refiner records
Reporting basis
Reporting period or measurement date declared by the source method

Unit meaning: One unit is one identified processing entity with mineral or metal scope, location, source relationship, and dated evidence status; it is not a conflict-free certification.

Table fields and units

  • Source profile and edition
  • Reporting entity and boundary
  • Upstream or downstream position
  • Mineral or metal
  • Commodity code when supplied
  • Reported value
  • Identified smelter/refiner records
  • Measurement-source edition
  • Assurance status

Published dimensions

  • Source profile and edition.
  • Reporting entity and boundary.
  • Upstream or downstream position.
  • Mineral or metal.
  • Commodity code when supplied.
  • Smelter/refiner name, address and stable identifier.
  • Supplier link.
  • Country of processing.
  • Country-of-origin state.
  • Recycled, scrap, primary or mixed origin.
  • High-risk-area assessment method and date.
  • Traceability record availability.
  • Third-party audit availability, scope, period and auditor.
  • Due-diligence scheme name and version.
  • Commission-recognition decision and date where applicable.
  • Conformity evidence type and validity period.
  • Reporter conclusion.
  • Confidentiality or omission state.
  • Reporting period.
  • Source and assurance status.

Disclosure method

Formula information

Status
Not applicable
Formula type
Structured Disclosure

Disclosure form

No single formula

Populate the structured fields from qualifying source observations and retain each field-level unit, boundary, status, and method; do not collapse the disclosure into one calculated value.

Verified sources

Evidence and status sources

Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.

Measurement evidence

  • Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026

    Regulation (EU) 2017/821, Official Journal act

    Publisher
    European Union
    Edition
    2017 edition
    Locator
    Article 4 traceability PDF p8, Article 5 p9, Articles 6-7 p10, Articles 8-9 pp11-12 and Article 17 pp14-15.

    Supports: Supports the measurement definition, boundary, and source-reported fields for Identified smelters and refiners by due-diligence evidence status.

    Open official source

Use with context

Interpretation boundaries

Method disclosures required

Source-edition basis: Regulation (EU) 2017/821, Official Journal act — 2017 edition. Retain the exact source edition on every observation; later editions require a separate method profile.

  • Source profile and edition.
  • Reporting entity and boundary.
  • Upstream or downstream position.
  • Mineral or metal.
  • Commodity code when supplied.
  • Smelter/refiner name, address and stable identifier.
  • Supplier link.
  • Country of processing.
  • Retain the exact measurement-source edition with every observation.
  • One unit is one identified processing entity with mineral or metal scope, location, source relationship, and dated evidence status; it is not a conflict-free certification.

Record-specific limitations

  • An audit can have limited scope or period.
  • A recognised scheme can change.
  • Country of origin can be unavailable.
  • An indicative high-risk-area list is non-exhaustive.
  • Confidentiality can suppress evidence. Identification does not establish responsible sourcing, absence of adverse impact or legal compliance outside the named source profile.

Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.

Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.