Mine-site involuntary resettlement profile
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Mine-site profile of involuntary resettlement that is planned, ongoing or has occurred, including the source-reported number of people displaced and separate livelihood, rights and restoration context.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- People displaced — source-reported mine-site count
- Reporting basis
- Reporting date or measurement snapshot
- Aggregation
- Snapshot only; do not sum observations across measurement dates
- Pillar
- Social
- Topic
- Communities and human rights
- Controlled domain
- Human rights
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Mining-sector sites only. Keep planned, ongoing and occurred resettlement, projected and realized counts, and physical and economic displacement separate unless overlap is known.
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Version 1.1
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Topic 14.12 and disclosure 14.12.2, PDF pages 43-44
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- People displaced — source-reported mine-site count
- Reporting basis
- Reporting date or measurement snapshot
Unit meaning: A non-negative source-reported person count with a reference date and explicit projected, during-period, cumulative or other timing basis.
Table fields and units
- Mine site
- Jurisdiction
- Phase
- Reference date
- Count timing
- People displaced
- Displacement type
- Restoration context
Published dimensions
- mine-site identifier
- jurisdiction
- phase and reference date
- count timing basis
- person count
- physical or economic displacement
- overlap rule
- livelihood and restoration context
- privacy and assurance state
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaPopulate the structured fields from qualifying source observations and retain each field-level unit, boundary, status, and method; do not collapse the disclosure into one calculated value.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
GRI 14: Mining Sector 2024
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Version 1.1
- Locator
- Topic 14.12 and disclosure 14.12.2, PDF pages 43-44
Supports: Supports the mining-sector site profile and source-reported displaced-person observation.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: GRI 14: Mining Sector 2024, version 1.1, effective at the research cutoff.
- Identify the mine site, phase and reference date.
- State whether the count is projected, period-specific or cumulative.
- Describe physical/economic overlap and keep livelihood and remedy information separate.
Record-specific limitations
- A displaced-person count does not establish consent, lawful process, eligibility, compensation, livelihood restoration or remedy effectiveness.
- Repeated site vintages and overlapping physical and economic populations cannot be added without deduplication.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.