Search Sustopedia

MetricManagement communication of performance and progress in priority locations

Frequency of communication of nature performance and progress in priority locations to management

Measurement answer

What this metric measures

Frequency with which management receives communications on nature-related performance and progress in priority locations during the reporting period.

Specification

Metric specification

Result format
Single value
Unit
communications per reporting period — source-defined reporting unit
Reporting basis
Reporting period
Aggregation
Count qualifying communications to management during the reporting period; retain priority-location-level reporting where locations have materially different natural characteristics.
Pillar
Governance
Topic
Management communication of performance and progress in priority locations
Controlled domain
Reporting methodology and management context
Entity type
Metric

Reporting boundary

Communications to management concerning nature-related performance and progress in the organisation's priority locations.

Verified source occurrences

Framework coverage

This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.

  • Adopting Disclosure

    TNFD LEAP approach

    r002
    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Version 1.1, October 2023
    Requirement
    Not Specified
    Relationship
    Reuses Canonical Metric
    Mapping outcome
    Reused
    Source locator
    TNFD LEAP Approach v1.1, Annex 1, Table 28, PDF page 178, metric row 2
    Open official framework source
  • Adopting Disclosure

    TNFD Recommendations

    Source evidence
    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    September 2023
    Requirement
    Not Specified
    Relationship
    Defines Disclosure
    Mapping outcome
    Direct Evidence
    Source locator
    Page 49, suggested indicators supporting governance disclosure
    Open official framework source
  • Adopting Disclosure

    TNFD Recommendations

    a7c3d9ee2af9435ab0f5
    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    September 2023
    Requirement
    Not Specified
    Relationship
    Maps Source Identity
    Mapping outcome
    Published
    Source locator
    Page 49, suggested indicators supporting governance disclosure
    Open official framework source

Value structure

Dimensions and units

Unit
communications per reporting period — source-defined reporting unit
Reporting basis
Reporting period

Unit meaning: Values use communications per reporting period under the disclosed TNFD Recommendations method, period, location and reporting boundary.

Published dimensions

  • priority location
  • management recipient or management level
  • nature-related performance or progress subject
  • communication channel or forum
  • reporting period

Calculation method

Formula information

Status
Specified
Formula type
Rate

Formula

F = N / P

Apply the source-defined TNFD Recommendations method only within the disclosed location, ecosystem and value-chain boundary. The suggested governance indicator specifies a reportable frequency, recipient, subject matter, and location context. It can be reported as a scalar rate while retaining priority location and management-recipient dimensions.

Variables

SymbolVariableDefinitionUnit
FCommunication frequencyFrequency of qualifying communications concerning nature-related performance and progress in priority locations to management.communications per reporting period
NQualifying communicationsCount of communications to management concerning performance and progress in priority locations during the reporting period.communications
PReporting periodThe period over which qualifying communications are counted.reporting period

Verified sources

Evidence and status sources

Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.

Measurement evidence

  • Measurement evidenceChecked 27 August 2026

    Recommendations of the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures

    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    September 2023
    Locator
    Page 49, suggested indicators supporting governance disclosure

    Supports: The official TNFD Recommendations source supports the identity, boundary and method basis of “Frequency of communication of nature performance and progress in priority locations to management”.

    Open official source

Use with context

Interpretation boundaries

Method disclosures required

Source-edition basis: Recommendations of the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures, September 2023.

  • Define a qualifying communication and whether repeated discussion of the same matter is counted separately.
  • Identify the priority locations covered and the approach used to determine priority locations.
  • State the management population or level receiving the communications.
  • Disclose the reporting-period coverage and any excluded communication channels or locations.

Record-specific limitations

  • Communication frequency does not demonstrate the quality, completeness, timeliness, management response, or effectiveness of oversight.
  • Priority locations should not be combined where their natural characteristics are materially different.
  • The source presents this as a suggested supporting indicator rather than an Annex 1 core global metric.

Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.

Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.