Levels at which nature-related assessments are conducted
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Structured disclosure of the organizational levels at which nature-related assessments are conducted.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- category — source-defined reporting unit
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
- Aggregation
- Report each assessment level used; do not aggregate different assessment levels into one coverage value.
- Pillar
- Governance
- Topic
- Nature-related assessment coverage
- Controlled domain
- Nature, biodiversity and land
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
The organization’s nature-related assessments conducted at corporate, location-specific, and/or project or service-line-specific levels during the reporting period.
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting Disclosurer062
TNFD LEAP approach
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Version 1.1, October 2023
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Reuses Canonical Metric
- Mapping outcome
- Reused
- Source locator
- TNFD LEAP Approach v1.1, Annex 1, Table 28, PDF page 184, metric row 1
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
TNFD Recommendations
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- September 2023
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- TNFD Recommendations, September 2023, p. 99, metric A25.0
- Adopting Disclosureba6ccc09450d1b28f34b
TNFD Recommendations
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- September 2023
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Maps Source Identity
- Mapping outcome
- Published
- Source locator
- Page 99, metric A25.0 | TNFD Recommendations, September 2023, p. 99, metric A25.0
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- category — source-defined reporting unit
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
Unit meaning: Values use category under the disclosed TNFD Recommendations method, period, location and reporting boundary.
Table fields and units
- assessment level
- assessment boundary or scope
Published dimensions
- assessment level: corporate-wide
- assessment level: location-specific
- assessment level: project-specific
- assessment level: service-line-specific
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaReport the source-defined result with its stated fields and method disclosures. A25.0 explicitly calls for disclosure of assessment level(s), with defined categories covering corporate, location-specific, and project or service-line-specific assessment. It is reportable as a structured assessment-coverage disclosure, while retaining its Annex 2 additional-metric status.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 27 August 2026
Recommendations of the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- September 2023
- Locator
- TNFD Recommendations, September 2023, p. 99, metric A25.0
Supports: The official TNFD Recommendations source supports the identity, boundary and method basis of “Levels at which nature-related assessments are conducted”.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: Recommendations of the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures, September 2023.
- State which assessment level or levels were used.
- Describe the assessment boundary associated with each reported level.
- Identify whether the reported assessment level applies to corporate-wide, location-specific, project-specific, or service-line-specific assessment.
Record-specific limitations
- This disclosure identifies the level at which assessments were conducted; it does not establish the completeness, quality, materiality, or outcome of those assessments.
- Assessment levels are not interchangeable and should not be collapsed into a single coverage measure.
- A25.0 is an Annex 2 additional metric and is not a core Annex 1 comply-or-explain acceptance gate.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.