Management remuneration linked to climate-related risks and opportunities
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Reports how management remuneration in the current period is linked to climate-related risks and opportunities, preserving whether the entity expresses that linkage as a percentage, weighting, description or monetary amount.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Multi-field profile
- Unit
- Structured table — see field-level units
- Reporting basis
- Current annual reporting period
- Aggregation
- Do not add or average different expression forms. Monetary amounts may be summed only across non-overlapping management populations with the same currency, scale, period and linkage definition; percentages require recomputation from compatible numerators and denominators.
- Pillar
- Governance
- Topic
- Climate-related governance and remuneration
- Controlled domain
- Governance and business conduct
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Management remuneration recognised in the current period that the reporting entity identifies as linked to climate-related risks and opportunities. The management population, remuneration components, linkage criteria, expression form and denominator must be declared.
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting Disclosurekey-management-remuneration-climate-linkage
IPSASB SRS 1 Climate-related Disclosures
- Publisher
- International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board
- Edition
- IPSASB SRS 1, issued January 2026; effective 1 January 2028
- Requirement
- Conditional
- Relationship
- Reuses Canonical Metric
- Mapping outcome
- Reused
- Source locator
- paragraph 28(g)(i)-(ii), with the Appendix D key-management-personnel population
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards
- Publisher
- New Zealand External Reporting Board
- Edition
- NZ CS 1, NZ CS 2 and NZ CS 3 issued 14 December 2022; NZ CS 2 consolidated through November 2025 adoption amendments
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Paragraphs 8(d) and 22(h), PDF pages 7 and 10
- Adopting Disclosurenz-cs1-22-h-management-remuneration
Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards
- Publisher
- New Zealand External Reporting Board
- Edition
- NZ CS 1, NZ CS 2 and NZ CS 3 issued 14 December 2022; NZ CS 2 consolidated through November 2025 adoption amendments
- Requirement
- Conditional
- Relationship
- Maps Source Identity
- Mapping outcome
- Published
- Source locator
- NZ CS 1 paragraph 8(d) | NZ CS 1 paragraph 22(h)
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Structured table — see field-level units
- Reporting basis
- Current annual reporting period
Unit meaning: Each table field uses its stated unit. The reported form can be a percentage, weighting, narrative description or monetary amount; each quantitative field retains its declared unit and denominator.
Table fields and units
- Management population or role class
- Remuneration component or incentive arrangement
- Climate-related linkage
- Expression form
- Reported percentage, weighting, description or amount
- Denominator, currency, scale and method notes
Published dimensions
- Management population and role class
- Remuneration component and incentive arrangement
- Climate-related risk or opportunity linkage
- Expression form: percentage, weighting, description or amount
- Percentage denominator or monetary currency and scale
- Reporting entity and organizational boundary
- Reporting period
- NZ CS 1 edition and application basis
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaPreserve the source-permitted expression form and its supporting fields. When a percentage is reported, retain its compatible numerator and denominator rather than averaging published percentages.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 1 September 2026
Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standard 1 Climate-related Disclosures
- Publisher
- New Zealand External Reporting Board
- Edition
- NZ CS 1, NZ CS 2 and NZ CS 3 issued 14 December 2022; NZ CS 2 consolidated through November 2025 adoption amendments
- Locator
- Paragraphs 8(d) and 22(h), PDF pages 7 and 10
Supports: NZ CS 1 requires management remuneration linked to climate-related risks and opportunities in the current period to be disclosed as a percentage, weighting, description or amount of overall management remuneration.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: NZ CS 1, NZ CS 2 and NZ CS 3 issued 14 December 2022; NZ CS 2 consolidated through November 2025 adoption amendments
- Reporting entity, reporting period and organizational boundary
- Management population, role classes and included remuneration components
- Climate-related risk or opportunity linkage criteria and applicable incentive arrangements
- Expression form and, where quantitative, the unit, currency, scale, numerator and denominator
- Applicable NZ CS 1 edition, reporting boundary, period and application basis
Record-specific limitations
- Percentage, weighting, narrative and monetary-amount disclosures are different representations and are not directly interchangeable.
- The NZ CS 1 management population can differ from an executive-management population used by another framework.
- Differences in remuneration components, linkage criteria, denominator and timing can materially limit comparability.
- A narrative disclosure, unavailable amount or inapplicable result must not be represented as zero.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.