Search Sustopedia

MetricIndigenous Peoples and Local Communities consultation

Operational locations with Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities consultation

Measurement answer

What this metric measures

Reports the number of operational locations where Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities are present or affected, together with the percentage of those locations where consultation has occurred.

Specification

Metric specification

Result format
Multi-field profile
Unit
Structured table — see field-level units
Reporting basis
Reporting period
Aggregation
Total count of operational locations where Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities are present or affected, and the percentage of those locations where consultation has occurred.
Pillar
Social
Topic
Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities consultation
Controlled domain
Affected communities
Entity type
Metric

Reporting boundary

Operational locations where Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities are present or affected by the organization’s activities.

Verified source occurrences

Framework coverage

This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.

  • Adopting Disclosure

    TNFD sector guidance

    Source evidence
    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents)
    Requirement
    Not Specified
    Relationship
    Defines Disclosure
    Mapping outcome
    Direct Evidence
    Source locator
    Additional sector guidance, p. 89, Additional sector metrics table, F.A23.5 | Page 89, additional sector metrics table, F.A23.5
    Open official framework source
  • Adopting Disclosure

    TNFD sector guidance

    F.A23.5
    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Version 1.0, June 2025
    Requirement
    Recommended
    Relationship
    Maps Source Identity
    Mapping outcome
    Published
    Source locator
    Page 89, additional sector metrics table, F.A23.5
    Open official framework source

Value structure

Dimensions and units

Unit
Structured table — see field-level units
Reporting basis
Reporting period

Unit meaning: Each field uses its stated unit and retains the applicable sector, reporting boundary, period and method.

Table fields and units

  • Operational locations where IPLCs are present or affected, number
  • Operational locations where IPLC consultation has occurred, number
  • Operational locations with IPLC consultation, percentage

Published dimensions

  • Operational location
  • Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities presence or affected status
  • Consultation occurrence

Calculation method

Formula information

Status
Specified
Formula type
Percentage

Formula

Percentage of operational locations with IPLC consultation = (operational locations where IPLCs are present or affected and consultation has occurred / total operational locations where IPLCs are present or affected) × 100

Apply the source-defined TNFD sector-guidance method within the stated reporting boundary. The metric has an explicit reportable population, count and percentage outcome. It is distinct from general engagement-management disclosures and from metrics on community impacts because it specifically measures consultation coverage for operational locations with IPLC presence or exposure.

Variables

SymbolVariableDefinitionUnit
CConsulted locationsNumber of operational locations where Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities are present or affected and consultation has occurred.number of locations
TRelevant locationsTotal number of operational locations where Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities are present or affected by the organization’s activities.number of locations
PConsultation percentagePercentage of relevant operational locations where consultation has occurred.%

Verified sources

Evidence and status sources

Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.

Measurement evidence

  • Measurement evidenceChecked 30 August 2026

    TNFD additional sector guidance collection

    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents)
    Locator
    Additional sector guidance, p. 89, Additional sector metrics table, F.A23.5 | Page 89, additional sector metrics table, F.A23.5

    Supports: The official TNFD sector guidance supports the identity, boundary and method basis of “Operational locations with Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities consultation”.

    Open official source

Use with context

Interpretation boundaries

Method disclosures required

Source-edition basis: TNFD sector guidance, Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents).

  • Disclose the basis for identifying locations where Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities are present or affected.
  • Disclose the basis used to determine whether consultation has occurred.
  • Disclose the numerator and denominator used for the reported percentage.

Record-specific limitations

  • The source does not define a consultation quality threshold, consultation process, or location-identification methodology.
  • The percentage is meaningful only in relation to the reported total population of locations where Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities are present or affected.

Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.

Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.