Operations and suppliers at significant forced-labour risk
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Operations and suppliers that the reporting organization considered at significant risk of forced or compulsory labour under a declared assessment method, retained by type, geography, worker population and measures taken without claiming that an incident occurred.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- Significant forced-labour risk-assessment records
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period or measurement date declared by the source method
- Aggregation
- Do not sum or arithmetically average reported percentages, rates, ratios, or averages; consolidate only from compatible component observations under a disclosed method.
- Pillar
- Social
- Topic
- Value-chain human rights and due diligence
- Controlled domain
- Human rights
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Operation and supplier rows stay separate. Risk rows are non-additive because one entity can appear under multiple geographies, commodities, populations or risk factors. A source-reported count is summed only across mutually exclusive entity sets with a stable identifier and matching method.
Cross-library identity
Library mappings and variants
These links compare quantity, population, boundary, period, unit, denominator, aggregation, dimensions, and method edition. Partial relationships are navigation aids only and never authorize observation reuse.
- Aggregate relationshipPartial relationship; observations remain separate.Geographies or commodities for which there is significant risk of child labour or of forced labour… — SBM-3
- Related but distinct metricPartial relationship; observations remain separate.Ranked apparel supply-chain workforce, environmental and safety risks
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureESRS S2
European Sustainability Reporting Standards
- Publisher
- EFRAG
- Edition
- Taxonomy entry point dated 22 December 2023; package published 30 August 2024
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Component Of
- Mapping outcome
- Cross Library Link
- Source locator
- ESRS S2; SBM-3; paragraph 11; datapoint S2.SBM-3_04; taxonomy concept esrs_DisclosureOfGeographiesOrCommoditiesForWhichThereIsSignificantRiskOfChildLabourOrOfForcedLabourOrCompulsoryLabourAmongWorkersInUndertakingSValueChainExplanatory
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
European Sustainability Reporting Standards
- Publisher
- European Commission
- Edition
- Consolidated 1 January 2025 edition
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- S2 scope and matters PDF pp240-244, paragraph 19 p246, paragraph 36 p249 and adequate-wage action example p256.
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016 edition
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- effective date and rights PDF pp1-2; Disclosure 409-1 p8
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Significant forced-labour risk-assessment records
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period or measurement date declared by the source method
Unit meaning: One unit is one operation or supplier and geography assessed as significant risk under the stated source method; it is not an incident or affected-person count.
Table fields and units
- Source profile and edition
- Operation or supplier
- Supplier tier
- Site or operation type
- Country, region or other geography
- Reported value
- Significant forced-labour risk-assessment records
- Measurement-source edition
- Assurance status
Published dimensions
- Source profile and edition.
- Operation or supplier.
- Supplier tier.
- Site or operation type.
- Country, region or other geography.
- Commodity or activity when reported.
- Worker population and vulnerability context when reported.
- Risk topic.
- Significant-risk status.
- Assessment method, evidence sources and threshold.
- Assessment date and coverage interval.
- Measure type, status and reporting period.
- Reporting boundary.
- Source and assurance status.
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaPopulate the structured fields from qualifying source observations and retain each field-level unit, boundary, status, and method; do not collapse the disclosure into one calculated value.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, consolidated 1 January 2025
- Publisher
- European Commission
- Edition
- Consolidated 1 January 2025 edition
- Locator
- S2 scope and matters PDF pp240-244, paragraph 19 p246, paragraph 36 p249 and adequate-wage action example p256.
Supports: Supports the measurement definition, boundary, and source-reported fields for Operations and suppliers at significant forced-labour risk.
Open official source - Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
GRI 409: Forced or Compulsory Labor 2016
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016 edition
- Locator
- effective date and rights PDF pp1-2; Disclosure 409-1 p8
Supports: Supports the measurement definition, boundary, and source-reported fields for Operations and suppliers at significant forced-labour risk.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, consolidated 1 January 2025 — Consolidated 1 January 2025 edition; GRI 409: Forced or Compulsory Labor 2016 — 2016 edition. Retain the exact source edition on every observation; later editions require a separate method profile.
- Source profile and edition.
- Operation or supplier.
- Supplier tier.
- Site or operation type.
- Country, region or other geography.
- Commodity or activity when reported.
- Worker population and vulnerability context when reported.
- Risk topic.
- Retain the exact measurement-source edition with every observation.
- One unit is one operation or supplier and geography assessed as significant risk under the stated source method; it is not an incident or affected-person count.
Record-specific limitations
- Country and commodity risk can be contextual rather than entity-specific.
- Assessment quality and visibility vary by supplier tier.
- A measure does not prove effectiveness. A risk flag does not establish a victim, event, legal breach or prevalence level.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.