Operations assessed for corruption risk
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Number and percentage of declared operations assessed for corruption-related risk under a stated assessment event, lookback and operation definition.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- Structured table — field-level units: Operations assessed — count and percent of total operations
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
- Aggregation
- Combine only compatible component counts and recompute the percentage; never average percentages
- Pillar
- Governance
- Topic
- Business conduct and compliance
- Controlled domain
- Governance and business conduct
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Use one operation definition, assessment event, lookback and entity boundary. Keep significant-risk findings separate from coverage and combine only disjoint compatible counts.
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Disclosure 205-1 and operation definition, PDF page 8
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2021
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Operation-population context, PDF pages 13-14
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Structured table — field-level units: Operations assessed — count and percent of total operations
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
Unit meaning: Each table field uses its stated unit. The table shows assessed-operation count, positive total-operation count and a 0-to-100 percent result for the same definition, boundary and lookback.
Table fields and units
- Operation population
- Assessment event
- Lookback
- Operations assessed
- Total operations
- Percent assessed
- Significant-risk context
Published dimensions
- operation definition
- assessment event
- lookback
- assessed count
- total operation count
- geography
- significant-risk finding state
- entity boundary
- reporting period
Calculation method
Formula information
- Status
- Specified
- Formula type
- Percentage
Formula
assessed_operation_percentage = (assessed_operation_count ÷ total_operation_count) × 100Apply this formula only with the metric's declared population, reporting period, units, denominator, and method-edition controls.
Variables
| Symbol | Variable | Definition | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
assessed_operation_count | assessed operation count | Input defined by the reporting boundary for Operations assessed for corruption risk. | count |
total_operation_count | total operation count | Input defined by the reporting boundary for Operations assessed for corruption risk. | count |
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
GRI 205: Anti-corruption 2016
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016
- Locator
- Disclosure 205-1 and operation definition, PDF page 8
Supports: Supports operation-level corruption-risk assessment coverage and significant-risk context.
Open official source - Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2021
- Locator
- Operation-population context, PDF pages 13-14
Supports: Supports the total-operation population context used by the coverage denominator.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: GRI 205: Anti-corruption 2016 and GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021, current effective editions at the research cutoff.
- Define the operation population and assessment event.
- State the lookback, boundary and reporting period.
- For the percentage, use compatible assessed and total counts with a positive denominator.
Record-specific limitations
- Assessment coverage does not establish that corruption risk is absent, low or controlled.
- Significant-risk results are not denominators or performance scores.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.