Operations with significant negative impacts on local communities
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Structured profile of operations reported as having significant actual or potential negative impacts on local communities, retaining impact state, domain, significance basis and community context.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- Structured table — field-level units: Structured operation-impact records; no universal scalar unit
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
- Aggregation
- Non-additive; retain the complete declared profile and do not force a scalar total
- Pillar
- Social
- Topic
- Communities and human rights
- Controlled domain
- Human rights
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Keep actual and potential impacts separate. One operation can have multiple overlapping impact rows and affect multiple communities; rows are not summed.
Cross-library identity
Library mappings and variants
These links compare quantity, population, boundary, period, unit, denominator, aggregation, dimensions, and method edition. Partial relationships are navigation aids only and never authorize observation reuse.
- Aggregate relationshipPartial relationship; observations remain separate.Location of operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts on local communities profile — GRI…
- Aggregate relationshipPartial relationship; observations remain separate.Operations with significant actual and potential impacts on local communities profile — GRI 413-2, paragraph a
- Aggregate relationshipPartial relationship; observations remain separate.Significant actual and potential negative impacts of operations profile — GRI 413-2, paragraph a
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureGRI 413-2
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Files published 19 June 2025; entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Component Of
- Mapping outcome
- Cross Library Link
- Source locator
- GRI 413-2, paragraph a; taxonomy entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Adopting DisclosureGRI 413-2
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Files published 19 June 2025; entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Component Of
- Mapping outcome
- Cross Library Link
- Source locator
- GRI 413-2, paragraph a; taxonomy entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Adopting DisclosureGRI 413-2
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Files published 19 June 2025; entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Component Of
- Mapping outcome
- Cross Library Link
- Source locator
- GRI 413-2, paragraph a; taxonomy entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Disclosure 413-2 and guidance, PDF pages 10-11
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Structured table — field-level units: Structured operation-impact records; no universal scalar unit
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
Unit meaning: Each table field uses its stated unit. Each row describes an operation-impact relationship. A row is not a community, person, incident or quantified harm.
Table fields and units
- Operation
- Location
- Community context
- Actual or potential
- Impact domain
- Significance basis
- Assessment date
Published dimensions
- operation identifier
- privacy-safe location
- community or rights-holder group
- actual or potential impact
- impact domain
- significance method
- assessment date
- entity boundary and period
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaPopulate the structured fields from qualifying source observations and retain each field-level unit, boundary, status, and method; do not collapse the disclosure into one calculated value.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
GRI 413: Local Communities 2016
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016
- Locator
- Disclosure 413-2 and guidance, PDF pages 10-11
Supports: Supports the operation-impact profile for significant actual or potential negative community impacts.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: GRI 413: Local Communities 2016, current effective edition at the research cutoff.
- Identify the operation and privacy-safe community context.
- State whether each impact is actual or potential and describe the significance method.
- Do not convert table rows into a harmed-person or community count.
Record-specific limitations
- The profile reflects identified and reported significant impacts, not all impacts or affected people.
- It does not establish legal liability, causation, remedy or outcome, and location detail may require suppression.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.