Product and service health and safety noncompliance incidents
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Distinct incidents in which product or service health and safety impacts were determined not to comply with a named regulation or voluntary code.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- Distinct health and safety noncompliance incidents
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
- Aggregation
- Add only non-overlapping records after applying the stated identity and deduplication controls
- Pillar
- Social
- Topic
- Consumers and product responsibility
- Controlled domain
- Consumers and end users
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Add only disjoint incident matters. Product, hazard, jurisdiction and outcome views may overlap; information-and-labeling incidents remain separate.
Cross-library identity
Library mappings and variants
These links compare quantity, population, boundary, period, unit, denominator, aggregation, dimensions, and method edition. Partial relationships are navigation aids only and never authorize observation reuse.
- Related but distinct metricPartial relationship; observations remain separate.Apparel restricted-substance control system profile
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Disclosure 416-2, PDF page 9
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Distinct health and safety noncompliance incidents
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
Unit meaning: A non-negative count of distinct incident matters under the named regulation or code; products, hazards, findings and outcomes are not automatic extra incidents.
Table fields and units
- Incident identity
- Product or service
- Lifecycle stage
- Rule
- Authority
- Jurisdiction
- Finding date
- Outcome
Published dimensions
- product or service
- category or batch
- lifecycle stage
- market and jurisdiction
- regulation or code
- authority
- event and decision dates
- finding and outcome
- deduplication rule
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaPopulate the structured fields from qualifying source observations and retain each field-level unit, boundary, status, and method; do not collapse the disclosure into one calculated value.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
GRI 416: Customer Health and Safety 2016
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2016
- Locator
- Disclosure 416-2, PDF page 9
Supports: Supports the product and service health and safety noncompliance incident profile.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: GRI 416: Customer Health and Safety 2016, current effective edition at the research cutoff.
- Name the applicable rule, authority and jurisdiction.
- Define incident identity and period treatment.
- Keep affected products, outcomes and recalls distinct from incident count.
Record-specific limitations
- The count depends on applicable rules, monitoring, complaints, enforcement and classification.
- It does not measure severity, units exposed, consumers harmed, injury frequency, recalls, compliance rate or overall safety.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.