Reported severe human-rights issues and incidents in the value chain
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Severe human-rights issues and incidents reported as connected to the reporting organization's upstream or downstream value chain during the reporting period, retained with their case state, severity method, affected population, connection and privacy treatment without treating a report as substantiation or an incidence rate.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Multi-field profile
- Unit
- Reported severe human-rights issues or incidents
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period or measurement date declared by the source method
- Aggregation
- Sum only non-overlapping rows with compatible populations, periods, definitions, units, and deduplication rules.
- Pillar
- Social
- Topic
- Value-chain human rights and due diligence
- Controlled domain
- Human rights
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
One matter can enter several channels and categories, so counts require a stable case identifier and declared deduplication. Issue and incident categories, affected populations, rights topics and process states are parallel breakdowns. Counts are added only across mutually exclusive cases under the same current-edition severity and reported-case method.
Cross-library identity
Library mappings and variants
These links compare quantity, population, boundary, period, unit, denominator, aggregation, dimensions, and method edition. Partial relationships are navigation aids only and never authorize observation reuse.
- Different source editionPartial relationship; observations remain separate.Severe human rights issues and incidents connected to upstream and downstream value chain no… — S2-4 — fact 9e2e6c
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
European Sustainability Reporting Standards
- Publisher
- European Commission
- Edition
- Consolidated 1 January 2025 edition
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- S2 scope and matters PDF pp240-244, paragraph 19 p246, paragraph 36 p249 and adequate-wage action example p256.
- Adopting DisclosureESRS S2
European Sustainability Reporting Standards
- Publisher
- EFRAG
- Edition
- Taxonomy entry point dated 22 December 2023; package published 30 August 2024
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Edition Variant
- Mapping outcome
- Cross Library Link
- Source locator
- ESRS S2; S2-4; paragraph 36; datapoint S2-4_11; taxonomy concept esrs_DisclosureOfSevereHumanRightsIssuesAndIncidentsConnectedToUpstreamAndDownstreamValueChainNOAffectedCommunitiesNOConsumersAndEndusersThatHaveBeenReportedExplanatory
- Adopting Disclosurevalue-chain-human-rights-incidents
EU Voluntary Sustainability Reporting Standard
- Publisher
- European Commission / EFRAG
- Edition
- Commission delegated act adopted 3 July 2026; pending Official Journal publication
- Requirement
- Conditional
- Relationship
- Reuses Canonical Metric
- Mapping outcome
- Reused
- Source locator
- Annex I paragraph 62(c)
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Reported severe human-rights issues or incidents
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period or measurement date declared by the source method
Unit meaning: One unit is a source-reported issue or incident under the declared case, severity, connection, and deduplication method; reported does not mean substantiated.
Table fields and units
- Source profile and edition
- Case or aggregate identifier
- Issue or incident
- Allegation, complaint, proceeding, reported case, investigation, finding, substantiation, remediation and closure states
- Severity method and threshold
- Reported value
- Reported severe human-rights issues or incidents
- Measurement-source edition
- Assurance status
Published dimensions
- Source profile and edition.
- Case or aggregate identifier.
- Issue or incident.
- Allegation, complaint, proceeding, reported case, investigation, finding, substantiation, remediation and closure states.
- Severity method and threshold.
- Right or impact type.
- Upstream or downstream.
- Worker, community or other affected population.
- Supplier, site, geography and commodity when reported.
- Connection type.
- Reporting, occurrence and status dates.
- Repeat or linked-case rule.
- Privacy suppression.
- Materiality and phase-in state.
- Reporting boundary.
- Source and assurance status.
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaPopulate the structured fields from qualifying source observations and retain each field-level unit, boundary, status, and method; do not collapse the disclosure into one calculated value.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, consolidated 1 January 2025
- Publisher
- European Commission
- Edition
- Consolidated 1 January 2025 edition
- Locator
- S2 scope and matters PDF pp240-244, paragraph 19 p246, paragraph 36 p249 and adequate-wage action example p256.
Supports: Supports the measurement definition, boundary, and source-reported fields for Reported severe human-rights issues and incidents in the value chain.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, consolidated 1 January 2025 — Consolidated 1 January 2025 edition. Retain the exact source edition on every observation; later editions require a separate method profile.
- Source profile and edition.
- Case or aggregate identifier.
- Issue or incident.
- Allegation, complaint, proceeding, reported case, investigation, finding, substantiation, remediation and closure states.
- Severity method and threshold.
- Right or impact type.
- Upstream or downstream.
- Worker, community or other affected population.
- Retain the exact measurement-source edition with every observation.
- One unit is a source-reported issue or incident under the declared case, severity, connection, and deduplication method; reported does not mean substantiated.
Record-specific limitations
- A reported case can remain unsubstantiated.
- Confidentiality and privacy can suppress details.
- Severe impact thresholds differ.
- Value-chain connection does not necessarily mean the undertaking caused or contributed to the matter. A low count can reflect weak channels or limited visibility. The measure does not show affected-person prevalence or remediation quality.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.