Significant instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Distinct significant instances in which the organization failed to comply with an applicable law or regulation, with fine and non-monetary sanction attributes kept separate.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- Distinct significant legal non-compliance instances
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
- Aggregation
- Add only non-overlapping records after applying the stated identity and deduplication controls
- Pillar
- Governance
- Topic
- Business conduct and compliance
- Controlled domain
- Governance and business conduct
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Count disjoint significant non-compliance matters determined during the period. Exclude allegations, complaints and open investigations without a determination.
Cross-library identity
Library mappings and variants
These links compare quantity, population, boundary, period, unit, denominator, aggregation, dimensions, and method edition. Partial relationships are navigation aids only and never authorize observation reuse.
- Aggregate relationshipPartial relationship; observations remain separate.How significant instances of non compliance were determined profile — GRI 2-27, paragraph d
- Aggregate relationshipPartial relationship; observations remain separate.Significant instances of non compliance profile — GRI 2-27, paragraph c
- Different calculation methodPartial relationship; observations remain separate.Total significant instances of non compliance with laws and regulations during reporting period count — GRI 2-27,…
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureGRI 2-27
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Files published 19 June 2025; entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Component Of
- Mapping outcome
- Cross Library Link
- Source locator
- GRI 2-27, paragraph d; taxonomy entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Adopting DisclosureGRI 2-27
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Files published 19 June 2025; entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Component Of
- Mapping outcome
- Cross Library Link
- Source locator
- GRI 2-27, paragraph c; taxonomy entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2021
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Disclosure 2-27(a), (c) and (d) and guidance, PDF page 44
- Adopting DisclosureGRI 2-27
GRI Standards
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- Files published 19 June 2025; entry point dated 23 June 2025
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Method Variant
- Mapping outcome
- Cross Library Link
- Source locator
- GRI 2-27, paragraph a; taxonomy entry point dated 23 June 2025
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Distinct significant legal non-compliance instances
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period
Unit meaning: A non-negative count of distinct matters with a non-compliance determination and disclosed significance basis; sanction categories are attributes that can overlap.
Table fields and units
- Instance identity
- Matter family
- Law or regulation
- Jurisdiction
- Significance basis
- Determination date
- Fine flag
- Non-monetary sanction flag
Published dimensions
- instance identity
- significance basis
- law or regulation
- jurisdiction
- determination date
- fine-incurred flag
- non-monetary sanction flag
- matter-family key
- reporting period
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaPopulate the structured fields from qualifying source observations and retain each field-level unit, boundary, status, and method; do not collapse the disclosure into one calculated value.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 15 August 2026
GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021
- Publisher
- Global Reporting Initiative
- Edition
- 2021
- Locator
- Disclosure 2-27(a), (c) and (d) and guidance, PDF page 44
Supports: Supports the significant legal non-compliance instance count and overlapping sanction attributes.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021, current effective edition at the research cutoff.
- State the non-compliance determination and significance basis.
- Use an instance and matter-family identity to prevent sanction double counting.
- Name the applicable law, jurisdiction and reporting-period rule.
Record-specific limitations
- An allegation, complaint or open investigation is not a non-compliance instance.
- Instance count is not legal-action, proceeding, fine or conviction count; significance is reporter-defined.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.