Search Sustopedia

MetricNative vegetation in supply-chain sourcing areas

Supply chain sourcing area with native vegetation

Measurement answer

What this metric measures

Reports the percentage of supply-chain sourcing area that maintains native vegetation, with explicit treatment of sourcing areas from ecologically sensitive locations.

Specification

Metric specification

Result format
Single value
Unit
% — source-defined reporting unit
Reporting basis
Reporting period
Aggregation
Percentage of supply-chain sourcing area with native vegetation relative to sourcing areas from sensitive locations.
Pillar
Environmental
Topic
Native vegetation in supply-chain sourcing areas
Controlled domain
Nature, biodiversity and land
Entity type
Metric

Reporting boundary

Supply-chain sourcing areas, particularly sourcing areas in ecologically sensitive locations, within the organization's reported supply-chain boundary.

Verified source occurrences

Framework coverage

This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.

  • Adopting Disclosure

    TNFD sector guidance

    Source evidence
    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents)
    Requirement
    Not Specified
    Relationship
    Defines Disclosure
    Mapping outcome
    Direct Evidence
    Source locator
    TNFD Additional Sector Guidance, p. 75, Section 3.3, Table 12. | Source evidence summary: report the percentage of supply chain sourcing areas that maintain native vegetation, particularly in ecologically sensitive locations. | Page 75, Section 3.3, Table 12
    Open official framework source
  • Adopting Disclosure

    TNFD sector guidance

    FA.A1.1
    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Version 1.0, June 2024
    Requirement
    Recommended
    Relationship
    Maps Source Identity
    Mapping outcome
    Published
    Source locator
    Page 75, Section 3.3, Table 12
    Open official framework source

Value structure

Dimensions and units

Unit
% — source-defined reporting unit
Reporting basis
Reporting period

Unit meaning: Values use % under the disclosed TNFD sector-guidance method, reporting period and boundary.

Table fields and units

  • sourcing-area geography
  • sensitive-location status
  • sourcing area in scope
  • sourcing area with native vegetation
  • percentage with native vegetation

Published dimensions

  • geography: sourcing area
  • location sensitivity: ecologically sensitive location
  • land-cover condition: native vegetation
  • value-chain stage: supply-chain sourcing

Calculation method

Formula information

Status
Specified
Formula type
Percentage

Formula

Supply-chain sourcing area with native vegetation (%) = (sourcing area with native vegetation / supply-chain sourcing area from sensitive locations) × 100.

Apply the source-defined TNFD sector-guidance method within the stated reporting boundary. The candidate describes a directly reportable area-based percentage outcome rather than a method input. The retained denominator reflects the extracted specification and avoids broadening the measure to all supply-chain area without evidence. No shortlist entry matches this nature-specific area percentage.

Variables

SymbolVariableDefinitionUnit
NSourcing area with native vegetationSupply-chain sourcing area identified as maintaining native vegetation.area
ASupply-chain sourcing area from sensitive locationsSupply-chain sourcing area in the reported denominator, particularly sourcing areas from ecologically sensitive locations.area

Verified sources

Evidence and status sources

Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.

Measurement evidence

  • Measurement evidenceChecked 30 August 2026

    TNFD additional sector guidance collection

    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents)
    Locator
    TNFD Additional Sector Guidance, p. 75, Section 3.3, Table 12. | Source evidence summary: report the percentage of supply chain sourcing areas that maintain native vegetation, particularly in ecologically sensitive locations. | Page 75, Section 3.3, Table 12

    Supports: The official TNFD sector guidance supports the identity, boundary and method basis of “Supply chain sourcing area with native vegetation”.

    Open official source

Use with context

Interpretation boundaries

Method disclosures required

Source-edition basis: TNFD sector guidance, Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents).

  • Define native vegetation used for the calculation.
  • Define the sourcing-area boundary and the identification method for ecologically sensitive locations.
  • State the area measurement method and denominator used for the percentage.
  • Disclose whether the result covers all sourcing areas or only sourcing areas from sensitive locations.

Record-specific limitations

  • Comparability depends on the organization's definition and mapping of sourcing areas, sensitive locations, and native vegetation.
  • The evidence emphasizes ecologically sensitive locations; disclosures should distinguish results where the reported denominator is limited to those locations.
  • The metric is an area-based condition measure and does not by itself establish vegetation quality, biodiversity condition, or causation by the reporting organization.

Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.

Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.