Exposure to sensitive locations
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Reports financial-institution exposure to companies operating in sensitive locations. For banks, exposure is reported as an absolute lending amount and/or percentage of lending volume.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Multi-field profile
- Unit
- Structured table — see field-level units
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period disclosed by the financial institution
- Aggregation
- For banks, reported as an absolute amount or percentage of lending volume; disaggregated by applicable asset class where applicable
- Pillar
- Environmental
- Topic
- Nature-related financial exposure
- Controlled domain
- Sustainable finance
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
Exposure to companies operating in sensitive locations within the financial institution's applicable asset classes; for banks, lending exposure
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
TNFD sector guidance
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents)
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- Financial Institutions v2.0, PDF p.16, section 3.2, FI.C0.1, Exposure to sensitive locations | PDF p.16, §3.2, Financial institution core disclosure metric (FI.C0.1) – Exposure to sensitive locations
- Adopting DisclosureFI.C0.1
TNFD sector guidance
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Version 2.0, June 2024
- Requirement
- Conditional
- Relationship
- Maps Source Identity
- Mapping outcome
- Published
- Source locator
- PDF p.16, §3.2, Financial institution core disclosure metric (FI.C0.1) – Exposure to sensitive locations
- Adopting DisclosureUnnumbered in source
TNFD sector guidance
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Version 2.0, June 2024
- Requirement
- Conditional
- Relationship
- Maps Source Identity
- Mapping outcome
- Published
- Source locator
- p.19, Table 3; p.18, section 3.4 Asset class coverage
- Adopting DisclosureUnnumbered in source
TNFD sector guidance
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Version 2.0, June 2024
- Requirement
- Conditional
- Relationship
- Maps Source Identity
- Mapping outcome
- Published
- Source locator
- page 17
- Adopting DisclosureUnnumbered in source
TNFD sector guidance
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Version 2.0, June 2024
- Requirement
- Conditional
- Relationship
- Maps Source Identity
- Mapping outcome
- Published
- Source locator
- page 17
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Structured table — see field-level units
- Reporting basis
- Reporting period disclosed by the financial institution
Unit meaning: Each field uses its stated unit and retains the applicable sector, reporting boundary, period and method.
Table fields and units
- Asset class
- Sensitive-location assessment basis
- Exposure measure type
- Exposure amount or percentage
- Lending volume denominator where applicable
- Geographic sensitive location or location grouping
Published dimensions
- financial institution asset class
- exposure measure type
- lending volume denominator for banks
- sensitive-location assessment basis
- geographic sensitive location
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaReport the source-defined result with its stated fields and method disclosures. The candidate is the official FI.C0.1 core disclosure metric and specifies a standalone exposure profile. It merges with the other FI.C0.1 cluster under the same stable identity while retaining the banking-specific lending-volume expression. No shortlisted metric matches its nature-related sensitive-location and financial-institution exposure boundary.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 30 August 2026
TNFD additional sector guidance collection
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents)
- Locator
- Financial Institutions v2.0, PDF p.16, section 3.2, FI.C0.1, Exposure to sensitive locations | PDF p.16, §3.2, Financial institution core disclosure metric (FI.C0.1) – Exposure to sensitive locations
Supports: The official TNFD sector guidance supports the identity, boundary and method basis of “Exposure to sensitive locations”.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: TNFD sector guidance, Final English sector guidance collection through August 2026 (17 documents).
- Definition or criteria used to identify sensitive locations.
- Method used to identify companies operating in sensitive locations.
- Asset classes included, including the banking lending portfolio where applicable.
- Whether bank exposure is presented as an absolute lending amount, percentage of lending volume, or both.
- Treatment of exposures requiring further analysis or excluded from the assessment.
Record-specific limitations
- The metric supports identification of exposures requiring further analysis; it does not itself measure actual nature-related risk or impact.
- The extracted specification expressly identifies lending volume as the banking expression; units for other asset classes are not established in this evidence.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.