Sustopedia

Search Sustopedia

Results stay grouped by content type. A future collection joins Search as its own labelled group when its public index is ready.

MetricTNFD LEAP Risk assessment

Revenue reduction from lower demand

Measurement answer

What this metric measures

Assesses revenue reduction from lower demand within the organisation's declared TNFD LEAP location, ecosystem, activity, value-chain and period boundary.

Specification

Metric specification

Result format
Structured table
Unit
reporting currency — source-defined TNFD LEAP unit
Reporting basis
The organisation-defined TNFD LEAP assessment period, with the measurement date, baseline and reference period disclosed where applicable.
Aggregation
Aggregate only observations sharing the same source-defined location, ecosystem or biome, business activity, value-chain boundary, unit, period and assessment method; retain material disaggregation.
Pillar
Governance
Topic
TNFD LEAP Risk assessment
Controlled domain
Nature, biodiversity and land
Entity type
Metric

Reporting boundary

The reporting organisation's assessed revenue reduction from lower demand across nature-related transition-market or transition-reputation risk contexts, with risk cause, business activity, period and currency boundary retained.

Verified source occurrences

Framework coverage

This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.

  • Adopting Disclosure

    TNFD LEAP approach

    Source evidence
    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Version 1.1, October 2023
    Requirement
    Not Specified
    Relationship
    Defines Disclosure
    Mapping outcome
    Direct Evidence
    Source locator
    TNFD LEAP Approach v1.1, Annex 1, Table 26, PDF page 174, metric row 5 | TNFD LEAP Approach v1.1, Annex 1, Table 26, PDF page 174, metric row 11
    Open official framework source
  • Adopting Disclosure

    TNFD LEAP approach

    r026
    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Version 1.1, October 2023
    Requirement
    Not Specified
    Relationship
    Maps Source Identity
    Mapping outcome
    Published
    Source locator
    TNFD LEAP Approach v1.1, Annex 1, Table 26, PDF page 174, metric row 5
    Open official framework source
  • Adopting Disclosure

    TNFD LEAP approach

    r032
    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Version 1.1, October 2023
    Requirement
    Not Specified
    Relationship
    Maps Source Identity
    Mapping outcome
    Published
    Source locator
    TNFD LEAP Approach v1.1, Annex 1, Table 26, PDF page 174, metric row 11
    Open official framework source

Value structure

Dimensions and units

Unit
reporting currency — source-defined TNFD LEAP unit
Reporting basis
The organisation-defined TNFD LEAP assessment period, with the measurement date, baseline and reference period disclosed where applicable.

Unit meaning: Values use reporting currency under the source-defined TNFD LEAP location, ecosystem, business-activity, value-chain and assessment boundary.

Table fields and units

  • assessment_location_or_scope
  • reported_component_or_category
  • reported_value
  • unit_or_status
  • period_or_measurement_date
  • method_or_data_source

Published dimensions

  • Annex 1 Table 26
  • Disclosure inclusion: N/A
  • Category: Risk
  • Sub-category: Transition – Market
  • Assessment location, ecosystem or biome
  • Business activity and direct, upstream or downstream value-chain boundary where applicable
  • Source risk contexts: Transition-Market and Transition-Reputation

Disclosure method

Formula information

Status
Not applicable
Formula type
Structured Disclosure

Disclosure form

No single formula

Report the source-defined assessment result without inventing arithmetic. Preserve its location, ecosystem or biome, business activity, value-chain position, period, applicability and method. Annex 1 explicitly lists this as a suggested assessment metric. No existing public page was proven identical across measured construct, population, boundary, unit, aggregation, dimensions and method, so it remains a distinct canonical metric pending cross-library relationship review.

Verified sources

Evidence and status sources

Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.

Measurement evidence

  • Measurement evidenceChecked 29 August 2026

    Guidance on the identification and assessment of nature-related issues: The TNFD LEAP approach

    Publisher
    Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
    Edition
    Version 1.1, October 2023
    Locator
    TNFD LEAP Approach v1.1, Annex 1, Table 26, PDF page 174, metric row 5 | TNFD LEAP Approach v1.1, Annex 1, Table 26, PDF page 174, metric row 11

    Supports: The official TNFD LEAP v1.1 guidance supports the assessment identity, boundary and method basis of “Revenue reduction from lower demand”.

    Open official source

Use with context

Interpretation boundaries

Method disclosures required

Source-edition basis: Guidance on the identification and assessment of nature-related issues: The TNFD LEAP approach, Version 1.1, October 2023.

  • Assessment location, ecosystem or biome and organisational or value-chain boundary
  • Metric definition, included population or observations, exclusions, unit and period
  • Data source, direct measurement or proxy status, estimation method, baseline and uncertainty
  • Annex 1 Table 26 inclusion status (N/A) and any sector- or biome-specific adaptation
  • Annex 1 source table, row, category, sub-category, indicator and disclosure-inclusion status
  • Location, ecosystem or biome, business activity and value-chain position
  • Assessment period, applicability, data source, method, assumptions and limitations

Record-specific limitations

  • TNFD presents Annex 1 as a non-exhaustive set of suggested assessment metrics, not a universally mandatory disclosure checklist.
  • Results are not comparable when location, ecosystem or biome, business activity, value-chain position, baseline, period or measurement method differs.
  • This metric supports source lookup and does not by itself establish TNFD conformity or determine materiality.
  • The Annex 1 assessment-metric set is optional and non-exhaustive; a public metric page does not make the result a mandatory TNFD disclosure.
  • Core, Additional, Core placeholder and N/A describe alignment with the separate TNFD Recommendations disclosure set, not whether a LEAP assessment row is mandatory.

Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.

Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.