Portfolio companies with nature-positive commitments, publicly available nature policies and time-bound science-based nature targets
Measurement answer
What this metric measures
Assesses portfolio companies with nature-positive commitments, publicly available nature policies and time-bound science-based nature targets within the organisation's declared TNFD LEAP location, ecosystem, activity, value-chain and period boundary.
Specification
Metric specification
- Result format
- Structured table
- Unit
- Structured table — see field-level units
- Reporting basis
- The organisation-defined TNFD LEAP assessment period, with the measurement date, baseline and reference period disclosed where applicable.
- Aggregation
- Aggregate only observations sharing the same source-defined location, ecosystem or biome, business activity, value-chain boundary, unit, period and assessment method; retain material disaggregation.
- Pillar
- Governance
- Topic
- TNFD LEAP Strategy assessment
- Controlled domain
- Nature, biodiversity and land
- Entity type
- Metric
Reporting boundary
The reporting organisation's TNFD LEAP assessment for Strategy / Capital allocation/ investment, within the locations, ecosystems, activities and value-chain positions actually assessed.
Verified source occurrences
Framework coverage
This is one canonical metric. The bindings below show every verified framework occurrence without creating duplicate metric pages. Edition, disclosure, role, and relationship remain source-specific.
- Adopting DisclosureSource evidence
TNFD LEAP approach
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Version 1.1, October 2023
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Defines Disclosure
- Mapping outcome
- Direct Evidence
- Source locator
- TNFD LEAP Approach v1.1, Annex 1, Table 28, PDF page 181, metric row 2
- Adopting Disclosurer033
TNFD LEAP approach
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Version 1.1, October 2023
- Requirement
- Not Specified
- Relationship
- Maps Source Identity
- Mapping outcome
- Published
- Source locator
- TNFD LEAP Approach v1.1, Annex 1, Table 28, PDF page 181, metric row 2
Value structure
Dimensions and units
- Unit
- Structured table — see field-level units
- Reporting basis
- The organisation-defined TNFD LEAP assessment period, with the measurement date, baseline and reference period disclosed where applicable.
Unit meaning: Each table field uses its stated unit. Each component retains its source-defined amount, percentage, score, count, ratio, intensity or qualitative field and assessment boundary.
Table fields and units
- portfolio_company_count
- portfolio_exposure
- commitment_status
- public_nature_policy_status
- time_bound_science_based_target_status
Published dimensions
- Annex 1 Table 28
- Disclosure inclusion: N/A
- Category: Strategy
- Sub-category: Capital allocation/ investment
- Assessment location, ecosystem or biome
- Business activity and direct, upstream or downstream value-chain boundary where applicable
Disclosure method
Formula information
- Status
- Not applicable
- Formula type
- Structured Disclosure
Disclosure form
No single formulaReport the source-defined assessment result without inventing arithmetic. Preserve its location, ecosystem or biome, business activity, value-chain position, period, applicability and method. Annex 1 explicitly lists this as a suggested assessment metric. No existing public page was proven identical across measured construct, population, boundary, unit, aggregation, dimensions and method, so it remains a distinct canonical metric pending cross-library relationship review.
Verified sources
Evidence and status sources
Sustopedia checked each record-specific claim directly against primary publisher material. Labels distinguish current measurement authority from future compatibility and corroborative, legal, edition, or method status context. Corroborative evidence can support a stated limitation but cannot establish the core measurement by itself.
Measurement evidence
- Measurement evidenceChecked 29 August 2026
Guidance on the identification and assessment of nature-related issues: The TNFD LEAP approach
- Publisher
- Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures
- Edition
- Version 1.1, October 2023
- Locator
- TNFD LEAP Approach v1.1, Annex 1, Table 28, PDF page 181, metric row 2
Supports: The official TNFD LEAP v1.1 guidance supports the assessment identity, boundary and method basis of “Portfolio companies with nature-positive commitments, publicly available nature policies and time-bound science-based nature targets”.
Open official source
Use with context
Interpretation boundaries
Method disclosures required
Source-edition basis: Guidance on the identification and assessment of nature-related issues: The TNFD LEAP approach, Version 1.1, October 2023.
- Assessment location, ecosystem or biome and organisational or value-chain boundary
- Metric definition, included population or observations, exclusions, unit and period
- Data source, direct measurement or proxy status, estimation method, baseline and uncertainty
- Annex 1 Table 28 inclusion status (N/A) and any sector- or biome-specific adaptation
- Annex 1 source table, row, category, sub-category, indicator and disclosure-inclusion status
- Location, ecosystem or biome, business activity and value-chain position
- Assessment period, applicability, data source, method, assumptions and limitations
Record-specific limitations
- TNFD presents Annex 1 as a non-exhaustive set of suggested assessment metrics, not a universally mandatory disclosure checklist.
- Results are not comparable when location, ecosystem or biome, business activity, value-chain position, baseline, period or measurement method differs.
- This metric supports source lookup and does not by itself establish TNFD conformity or determine materiality.
- The Annex 1 assessment-metric set is optional and non-exhaustive; a public metric page does not make the result a mandatory TNFD disclosure.
- Core, Additional, Core placeholder and N/A describe alignment with the separate TNFD Recommendations disclosure set, not whether a LEAP assessment row is mandatory.
Interpret this metric with the stated reporting boundary, period convention, value shape, and unit. Results prepared with different boundaries or conventions may not be directly comparable.
Measurement evidence supports the core record-specific claims described above. Corroborative evidence can support limitations, while compatibility and status sources provide their separately labelled context. None of these cards by itself determines an organisation's legal applicability, filing readiness, assurance status, or compliance conclusion.